TRON SR RANKING June 4,2018

TRONSR_RANKING

On April 16, TRON Foundation officially announced TRON SR Guidelines.
According to this guideline, a super representative must meet 8 requirements.

Due to the increasing number of candidates, I think it is necessary to split the scoring project. The previous scoring principle was one point or zero points, but this is not very fair. Take the server configuration, there should be differences in the score between the 1T size and the 20T size hard disk. I think this will help enhance the level of the candidates and further develop the community.

Therefore, I have added some scoring projects by splitting, and so far there are fifteen items:

Basic scoring items: Official site, Team info, List of team members & pics, Team intros,
Operational scoring items: Local social applications, Annual community support plan, Livestream, MEET UP, Community promotion efforts
Technical scoring items: Testable nodes, Plans for hardware expansion, Plans for server placement, Server type, Server configuration, Expense budget.

TRONSR RANKING

1. Official Site

Provide an official site for community members to access, where information displayed matches the information provided by the team. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

2. Team info

Provide relevant materials and introduction of the company. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

3. Social media influence

Provide links to social applications, with over 500 fans. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

4. Annual community support plan

Candidates should make their own plans to support the community, with the plan no less than 200 words. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

5. List of team members & pics

Pictures of three or more, including the founder, need to be submitted in the election information. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

6. Team intros

Introduction of three or more, including the founder. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

7. Livestream

Screenshots or website links of livestream promotion should be submitted to comment area of SR Forum. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

8. Meet Up

Photos or relevant news reports links of MEET UP should be submitted to comment area of SR Forum. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

9. Community promotion efforts

The initial score is 0.2 point. Screenshots of the discussion about the super representative election in its own community should be provided in the comment area of the information. Scores will be given according to the number of people in the community and the degree of enthusiasm, with the maximum score of 1 point.

10. Testable nodes

Candidates need to build its own test network node and open the RPC port.
Testable nodes will be considered valid only if it can synchronize blocks. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

11. Plans for hardware expansion

As to the hardware expansion plan after June 26, candidates’ plan should start from improving node performance, and verification of the performance of node is mainly evaluated from three aspects:

(1) Speed, i.e., direct node performance, hardware configuration parameters, and processing data speeds are fast enough.

(2) Dual-system backup, which is a factor of stability and data security performance.

(3) In addition to verifying the node, multiple full nodes can also be provided, which can provide better API services to others.

According to above criteria, the content submitted by candidates will be scored appropriately, with a maximum score of 1 point.

12. Server location:
Explain clearly where the server is located. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

13. Server types:
Please explain what types of servers you are using. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

14. Sever configuration

As to the server configuration before June 26, set the official recommended configuration as a qualified line (device configuration: x1.16xlarge 64 core 1T memory 20T SSD storage (EBS) 25G bandwidth). Evaluation will also be implemented in three aspects of the performance mentioned in the expansion plan.

According to above criteria, the content submitted by candidates will be scored appropriately, with a maximum score of 1 point.

15. Budget expenses

Supply a clear budget line. 1 point if it meets the criteria, 0 otherwise.

All information of this ranking comes from the SR Forum. The candidates who did not submit information on the SR Forum will not be rated. If the information has updated by project parties, please indicate the updated information and reply in the original post. In order to facilitate ranking, it is hoped that the candidates will provide information in order so as to avoid omissions. If you have questions about the ranking, you can reply in the post or write to me personally. I will make changes based on the actual situation.

[Abstract] RightBTC, Tron Europe, Lianjinshu, and Community Node have updated information today, thus gaining score and ranking changes. The current top three candidates are: Dreams From TRON, Next Genius, and Team Tronics. The updated information at each time is reviewed and evaluated based on information submitted to the SR Forum the day before. Therefore it is common that you submit information today and find it not being updated. Don’t worry, just wait till the next day.

[Candidates submitting information]

Bitcoin God、Next Genius、Game.com、ODYSSEY、LinkVC、Bixin、Dreams From TRON、AntPool、READ、Cobo、RightBTC、MDT、GSC、Sesameseed、Lianjinshu、Team Tronics、CryptoDiva、GIFTO、Capital Genesis、FreeSpaceWifi、Bitcoinworld、AlphaCoinFund、Cryptoguyinza、Skypeople、Punch Foundation、Node Capital、HyperPay、TRON Europe、TRON proposal、ChainDD、Top.One、Crypto Chain、DAG、34rth、Infinity Stones、dexnode、CryptoGirls、HelloWorld、 Community Node、D2F、Charity Compassion Coin、DonGiatti

[Candidates not submitting information]

BEECOOL、DAC、BTCC、OK Blockchain Capital

The ranking above is based on the information provided by the official TRON Foundation. It only represents my personal viewpoint for your reference when voting. If you have any different opinions, please leave a message.

Irina

We kindly remind to update our official site to https://www.cryptogirls.ro



Thank you,
CryptoGirls

bondibox

I believe network topography ought to be the biggest consideration when grading a TronSR deployment. Are four 10 Gbps servers better than one 25 Gbps server? What about the Witness node? Is it exposed, with just a firewall separating it from the internet? Grading the deployments based on the size of the largest instance is an over simplification that doesn't give any real important information.